• 8 years ago
    Saved!
    A branch of the Swedish Liberal People's Party has argued for the legalization of incest and necrophilia http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/incest-and-necrophilia-should-be-legal-youth-swedish-liberal-peoples-party-a6891476.html
    Not sure what to make of this.
    Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … The necrophilia thing I get, but with incest there are too many problems. You can never know if the other part of the relationship has manipulated the other into doing it over the years. There is also a much bigger chance for the relationship to stem from abuse than there is in an average relationship.
      Loading …
    • Husky Wing
      Saved!
      Husky Wing
      Editing … I feel like even more of a loony than I already am when I can't think of any reason not to legalize these. Are there health hazards? You propose a great point, but if it's completely consensual, then is the only thing "wrong" with the relationship based on society's moral standards?
      Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … The problem is inherent in the fact that when you grow up with someone, you can manipulate them, harass them and abuse them for such a long time, that they don't even realize it. It's too big of a risk. And obviously there are gigantic health hazards, if you two get a baby, that baby is fucked up. Like completely fucked up.
      Loading …
    • Husky Wing
      Saved!
      Husky Wing
      Editing … Those are excellent reasons.
      Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … But I can't quickly think any reason for the necrophilia thing except "Yuck, icky!" and bacteria spreading.
      Loading …
    • rockshard PhD
      Saved!
      rockshard PhD
      Editing … statism tho
      Loading …
    • rockshard PhD
      Saved!
      rockshard PhD
      Editing … necrophilia should be illegal, not sure about incest cause I mean consent is still consent
      Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … Wait, why necrophilia should be illegal? The person would have given their consent while alive. By the logic of consent is consent, shouldn't necrophilia be okay?
      Loading …
    • rockshard PhD
      Saved!
      rockshard PhD
      Editing … A corpse can't revoke their consent and therefore cannot give it. But it's still just a corpse, no different from a blow doll if you think of it objectively. Arguably consent doesn't matter. Problem is it's unsanitary.
      Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … Yeah, the unsanitary part is a big problem. If necrophilia is to be okayed, the hygiene of it will be disgusting.
      Loading …
    • Nodley
      Saved!
      Nodley
      Editing … You gotta be desperate to fuck a corpse, I think I'd rather have a wank. Wouldn't the legs be stuck in place? They'd snap off if you tried to open them. As for incest all I have is an ugly brother.
      Loading …
    • Rich .
      Saved!
      Rich .
      Editing … They're both incredibly messed up. One's disrespectfully and unhygienically violating a corpse. The other's a twisted familial relationship with a high chance of abuse that produces children with generic deformities. I'm kind of annoyed these opinions actually exist, it gives ammunition to the "We can't have gay rights. What's next, legal incest? And then legal paedophilia?" argument.
      Loading …
    • Husky Wing
      Saved!
      Husky Wing
      Editing … oh, I hate the "what's next, pedophilia?" argument :(
      Loading …
    • Not Important
      Saved!
      Not Important
      Editing … Yeah, both of these in to the trash.
      Loading …
Deleted!
  • Saved!
    (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
    Loading …
    • Saved!
      Editing … (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
      Loading …
  • Saved!
    Editing … (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
    Loading …