• Pudding wrote his opinion about Drakengard 3
    8 years ago
    Saved!
    Drakengard 3 had the potential to be another classic, but releasing it in a, what looks to be like, both technically and artistically, pre-alpha state was a poor decision.
    Pros: Lore behind each weapon, excellent and diverse music, great character designs and voice acting, no shortage of great ideas, humorous, loads of weapons with varying combat styles, from time to time (although all too rare) mixes the gameplay up, great postgame content, good story...
    Cons: ...that suffers from atrocious pacing and horrible design decisions, poor main campaign, tiresome rudeness of the protagonist who rarely shows redeeming qualities in the main campaign, bad framerate, camera and controls, highly repetitive across both gameplay and writing, ''shock'' factor is overused and becomes formulaic, boring side quests, some truly horrible game design, environmental visuals would be subpar even on PS2, odd fourth wall breaking, your dragon can be called upon only when the game (rarely)allows it, dumb AI
    Loading …
    • Bob GutSmasha
      Saved!
      Bob GutSmasha
      Editing … It's related to Nier somehow isn't it?
      Loading …
    • Silent Gamer
      Saved!
      Silent Gamer
      Editing … I've heard that the first Drakengard game has multiple endings, and Nier is supposed to carry on from one of them.
      Loading …
    • Pudding
      Saved!
      Pudding
      Editing … Indeed it is and Silent's right. NIER is a follow-up story to the ending D (if I'm not mistaken) of the original Drakengard. Drakengard 3, paradoxically, is actually a prequel to the original Drakengard. They're all part of the same universe and Drakengard 3 features some locales from NIER, which was cool to play through.
      Loading …
Deleted!
  • Saved!
    (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
    Loading …
    • Saved!
      Editing … (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
      Loading …
  • Saved!
    Editing … (≡ˆ⊝ω⊝ˆ≡ )
    Loading …